Comments on Peter Singer and Christian EthicsTypePad2012-07-20T14:58:50ZRick Garnetthttps://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2012/07/peter-singer-and-christian-ethics/comments/atom.xml/Joms Lee commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2017c322f3952970b2012-09-28T00:38:05Z2012-09-28T00:38:05ZJoms LeeGood steps have been used in this article. By giving these type of examples we can easily understand what the...<p>Good steps have been used in this article. By giving these type of examples we can easily understand what the writer is saying in this article.</p>
<p></p>
<p><br />
Ines Rivero</p>Regina Prince commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2017744bdf20f970d2012-09-15T08:21:34Z2012-09-18T15:45:22ZRegina Princehttp://www.in.com/ines-rivero/profile-50000957.htmlPrecious blogger, Thanks for publishing this important material. I found it informative. Best regards !! Ines Rivero<p>Precious blogger, Thanks for publishing this important material. I found it informative. Best regards !!</p>
<p>Ines Rivero</p>N.D. commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2017616abdba1970c2012-07-24T14:50:13Z2012-07-24T14:50:13ZN.D.Thank you for deleting those comments that were not appropriate for a blog that serves to Mirror Justice, Professor Garnett....<p>Thank you for deleting those comments that were not appropriate for a blog that serves to Mirror Justice, Professor Garnett. God Bless your family and welcome baby John Joseph Garnett!</p>Rick Garnett commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2017616a83ed4970c2012-07-24T00:30:13Z2012-07-24T00:30:13ZRick GarnettWmBrennan: =-) I had to delete a few more nasty comments, BTW.<p>WmBrennan: =-)</p>
<p>I had to delete a few more nasty comments, BTW.</p>WmBrennan commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2016768b27f05970b2012-07-23T21:17:46Z2012-07-23T21:20:36ZWmBrennanOh sure, blame the baby ... (I kid re your kid.)<p>Oh sure, blame the baby ...</p>
<p>(I kid re your kid.) </p>Rick Garnett commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2017616a6fd97970c2012-07-23T19:30:30Z2012-07-23T21:20:36ZRick GarnettI deleted several comments, not because of the (silly) reason imagined by WmBrennan, but because they were, in my view,...<p>I deleted several comments, not because of the (silly) reason imagined by WmBrennan, but because they were, in my view, inappropriate and unproductive. I meant to "publicize" this fact but -- I confess! -- I was busy with my new baby and forgot. </p>N.D. commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2016768b15083970b2012-07-23T17:06:14Z2012-07-23T21:20:36ZN.D.A Human Person who recognizes the self-evident truth, and thus the universal truth, that every Human Person has been created...<p>A Human Person who recognizes the self-evident truth, and thus the universal truth, that every Human Person has been created equal in Dignity, while being complementary as male and female, is not being partisan.</p>N.D. commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e20177438c79d8970d2012-07-23T16:58:27Z2012-07-23T21:20:36ZN.D.I am wondering why my statement regarding the fact that it is only logical to assume that every son or...<p>I am wondering why my statement regarding the fact that it is only logical to assume that every son or daughter of a Human Individual (definition of person) is a Human Individual (definition of person) and thus CREATED equal in Dignity while being complementary as male and female, was considered an inappropriate comment in a discussion about a book that debates whether it is true that every son and daughter of a Human Person has an inherent Right to be treated with Dignity and respect?</p>WmBrennan commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2016768b13552970b2012-07-23T16:39:29Z2012-07-23T21:20:36ZWmBrennanPerhaps it was your reference to Robby George? The only comment of mine to be deleted (to date) included a...<p>Perhaps it was your reference to Robby George? The only comment of mine to be deleted (to date) included a critical swipe at George's partisanship ... </p>WmBrennan commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2017616a5d046970c2012-07-23T14:54:02Z2012-07-23T21:20:36ZWmBrennanIt's your blog, but don't you think it's the better practice to note that you've deleted a bunch of posts...<p>It's your blog, but don't you think it's the better practice to note that you've deleted a bunch of posts and why? Otherwise, how can commenters understand the line you draw between acceptable comments and non-acceptable. I could understand not bothering with this if a comment was just an obscenity filled rant, but none of the vanished comments I saw fit that bill. </p>N.D. commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e201774386883f970d2012-07-22T15:42:32Z2012-07-23T14:25:54ZN.D.Every philosopher should know that in order to find the truth, you must begin at the beginning. Truth begets truth...<p>Every philosopher should know that in order to find the truth, you must begin at the beginning. Truth begets truth until you add a false assumption, which is why, just like the cast of characters in The Emperor's New Clothes, one cannot find common ground in regards to abortion, without calling that which is true, a lie, if one does not recognize the Truth of the Sanctity of every Human Life from The Beginning.</p>Francis J. Beckwith commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e20176169b9bac970c2012-07-21T18:27:51Z2012-07-23T14:25:54ZFrancis J. Beckwithhttp://returntorome.comI highly recommend Charles' 2008 article in the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, "Common Ground on Surgical Abortion." In it,...<p>I highly recommend Charles' 2008 article in the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, "Common Ground on Surgical Abortion." In it, he finds common ground with Singer and does so with complete integrity and with some pretty insightful arguments. I look forward to reading the book. </p>David Nickol commented on 'Peter Singer and Christian Ethics'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e20177437d3a84970d2012-07-20T20:49:30Z2012-07-23T14:25:54ZDavid Nickolhttp://www.religiousleftlaw.comI am about a third of the way through, and whatever one may think of Peter Singer, I think you...<p>I am about a third of the way through, and whatever one may think of Peter Singer, I think you will be impressed with Charles Camosy (f you aren't already from his other endeavors, such as the Catholic Moral Theology blog). The book is amazingly readable, and not without surprises. Peter Singer rejects, for example, the "Famous Violinist" argument in favor of abortion even accepting the personhood of the unborn child. It is not too much of a burden, he maintains, to be attached to someone whose life depends on you for nine months. You can give up 9 months of your freedom if it will save the violinist's life. Peter Singer also believes Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and that abortion law should be determined by legislatures (and the people), not by courts. Also, even though brief, some of the quotes from Singer about animal suffering, and how much we are responsible for it because our choice of foods, can't help but jar you into taking the issue more seriously. </p>