Comments on On Theory and Moral Responsibility for Its ConsequencesTypePad2011-07-30T03:06:24ZRick Garnetthttps://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2011/07/on-moral-responsibility-for-the-consequences-of-ones-ideas/comments/atom.xml/coach outlet store online commented on 'On Theory and Moral Responsibility for Its Consequences'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e20163059487cb970d2012-05-16T10:16:08Z2012-05-21T12:51:26Zcoach outlet store onlinehttp://www.coachoutletstoreonlinesalebags.usI really appreciate what you'v posted here. I will recommend it to my friends. Thank you for sharing.<p>I really appreciate what you'v posted here. I will recommend it to my friends. Thank you for sharing.</p>Zenerx commented on 'On Theory and Moral Responsibility for Its Consequences'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e20162fbedefaa970d2011-10-26T13:14:13Z2011-10-26T13:14:13ZZenerxhttp://www.zenerx-review.orgBeing "morally responsible for the consequences of our theories" seems like a stretch. Theories just ain't real life. Responsible for...<p>Being "morally responsible for the consequences of our theories" seems like a stretch. Theories just ain't real life. Responsible for our actions? Yes, of course. Our theories? C'mon...</p>Helen Watson commented on 'On Theory and Moral Responsibility for Its Consequences'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2015434e7b27a970c2011-08-28T17:14:42Z2011-08-28T17:14:42ZHelen Watsonhttp://www.provillus-userreviews.comLanguage is often very imprecise. "Consequences" takes in a lot of ground. Obviously, every action has consequences, but it is...<p>Language is often very imprecise. "Consequences" takes in a lot of ground. Obviously, every action has consequences, but it is very difficult to articule precisely what they are. What seems clear at one time is often, and usually, seen in a different light at a later time. </p>Patrick Molloy commented on 'On Theory and Moral Responsibility for Its Consequences'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2015390508d77970b2011-07-31T14:14:13Z2011-07-31T14:14:13ZPatrick MolloyI believe the cautious and charitable conclusion in this post is compatible with the views of Dostoevsky. In a fascinating...<p>I believe the cautious and charitable conclusion in this post is compatible with the views of Dostoevsky. In a fascinating conversation in Florence with his fellow ex-radical Nikolay Strakhov D argued that even if his opponents maintained that 2 plus 2 does not equal 4, “illogicality is not a proof of error . . . the error is a clue to something hidden and concealed under the idea . . .[Dostoevsky] continued to sense a desire for the good that should be recognized and acknowledged.” Strakhov disagreed.</p>
<p>see pp. 356-7 of Joseph Frank’s Dostoevsky</p>
<p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=lp1RpM8o9BQC&pg=PA356&lpg=PA356&dq=dostoevsky+tornebuoni&source=bl&ots=hBsRpZNE6A&sig=5_kI8k2KhewK39qOT1hSLiL-OnU&hl=en&ei=zGE1TrTsDMbc0QH57aXhCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=dostoevsky%20tornebuoni&f=false" rel="nofollow">http://books.google.com/books?id=lp1RpM8o9BQC&pg=PA356&lpg=PA356&dq=dostoevsky+tornebuoni&source=bl&ots=hBsRpZNE6A&sig=5_kI8k2KhewK39qOT1hSLiL-OnU&hl=en&ei=zGE1TrTsDMbc0QH57aXhCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=dostoevsky%20tornebuoni&f=false</a></p>