Monday, February 8, 2010
Boycott Papers that Run Pro-Adultery Ads
Compliments of one of the free dailies, “Metro,” here in New York City we are being subjected to full back page ads for a pro-adultery website (which I will not mention in order not to further publicize their business; nor will I link to the ad in order not to further publicize the paper). Here’s a link on the Toronto Transit system’s rejection of a bid for the website’s ads (bravo!). I have decided to boycott “Metro” – and encourage all of my friends to do the same – for their lack of good judgment in running the ad. In our current information superhighway world, any thoughts about how to spread the word about a boycott without too much collateral effect of providing additional publicity for the slimy product?
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2010/02/boycott-papers-that-run-proadultery-ads.html
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the
comment feed
for this post.
Do you consider these adds to be worse, about the same, or better than the adds for prostitutes that fill up the back of most free weekly papers? I don't really have a clear view on the issue (they might be worse in that maybe people who would never hire a prostitute would be tempted by these other adds, but I don't really know.)
Posted by: Matt | Feb 8, 2010 11:37:43 AM
Matt, the pedagogical impact of the ads for prostitutes is limited by the fact that we, as a society, still condemn that activity by making it illegal. The ads have to operate around the margins of mainstream society (for the most part). Since the adultery ads are for a perfectly legal venture (in most states pre-Lawrence, and probably all states post-Lawrence), it's all about what messages our culture is willing to "mainstream." It's tough to imagine a billboard with the message, "Life is short. Hire a hooker." But the messages, "Life is short. Have an affair." are cropping up, as are "Life is short. Get a divorce." ads from lawyers.
Posted by: rob vischer | Feb 8, 2010 12:29:31 PM