Friday, February 19, 2010
A divide that may not be bridged, by Sister Joan Chittister, NCR, 2/19/10
Being in Ireland as the country and the church continue the torturous process of resolving -- if that's possible -- the standoff between victims of sexual abuse and the local episcopacy ...
I've been watching the Irish sex abuse situation here for years. And learning
about communication from every minute of it. This is not the United States of
America. This is Catholic Ireland. Nothing could be more different than these
two cultures in their approach to a church problem. In the United States when
the sexual abuse crisis erupted and the church retreated behind a plexiglass of
legal responses, people picketed churches, signed petitions, demonstrated
outside chanceries, and formed protest groups.
In Ireland, the response had another kind of chill about it, however. In
Ireland the gulf got wider and deeper by the day. It felt like the massive
turning of a silent back against the bell towers and statues and holy water
fonts behind it. No major public protests occurred. "Not at all," as they are
fond of saying. But the situation moved at the upper echelon of the country
relatively quietly but like a glacier. Slowly but inexorably.
A country which, until recently, checked its constitution against "the teachings of the church" and had, therefore, allowed no contraceptives to be sold within its boundaries, unleashed its entire legal and political system against the storm.
They broke a hundred years of silence about the abuse of unwed mothers in the
so-called "Magdalene Launderies." They investigated the treatment of orphaned or
homeless children in the "industrial schools" of the country where physical
abuse had long been common. The government itself took public responsibility for
having failed to monitor these state-owned but church-run programs. And they
assessed compensatory damages, the results of which are still under review in
the national parliament....
The survivor's response to the meeting of Pope Benedict XVI with the Irish
Episcopacy had the ring of repugnance about it. "Pope Benedict," Andrew Madden,
a spokesperson for the survivors said, "has not articulated full acceptance of
the findings of the Murphy Report, as we asked him to do," (RTE1 News, February
16.) That is needed, he went on, "to quell the rise in revisionism and the surge
in denial from some quarters within the Catholic church in relation to its
The message is clear:
First, until the church, in an official way, admits that the findings of the
Murphy Report on the overwhelming amount of child abuse that went on in Dublin
are true and accepts responsibility for the climate that made cover up an
episcopal practice, the case, at least in the victims' minds, is not closed.
Archbishop Dermot Clifford of Cashel lamented that the Murphy investigation
might well be extended to all the dioceses in Ireland. If that happens, he said,
"the past won't be past for a long time.
Second, until the bishops who were part of the cover up all resign, the
victims argue, the church will not have proven either their rejection of the
practice, their determination to change or their ownership of the problem.
Point: Four bishops criticized in the report have offered their resignations, but so far the pope has officially accepted only one of them. a fifth bishop criticized in the report, Martin Drennan of Galway and Kilmacduagh, has said he did nothing wrong and won't resign. All were auxiliary bishops at the time of the first reports of abuse. They did nothing to bring the situation to light. But none of them, no one in the Irish episcopacy, has yet to admit to their own role in a cover-up. No bishop, in a land where the burden of guilt fell heavily on the backs of Irish people, has admitted his own guilt, his own defense of the institution rather than the care of the children. No one has said, "The church -- I -- was wrong in the handling of this scandal. Therefore, I, too, am responsible for this abuse."
So how are the Irish people reacting to the impasse? Well, as they opened Catholic Schools Week in Ireland this month, the Market Research Bureau of Ireland was reporting that 74 percent of the population think that "the church did not react properly to the Murphy Report" and that 61 percent of the population "want no Catholic control of elementary schools." Little more than half of the respondents think the church will really change to prevent abuse in the future, and 47 percent feel more negative than before toward the church.
Most telling of all, perhaps, is the fact that the support of the older
generation which, at its best, was once only marginally higher than the support
of 18-24 year olds, may be shifting even lower. "The fallout from the Murphy
report was a shock to the bishops," Archbishop Clifford said, and "had a far
greater negative effect on older people than the previous two investigations had
"While they were preaching at us they were damaging our children," an old
woman said. "What more can you say?"
From where I stand, it seems that the long-awaited meeting between the pope and the bishops of Ireland is over now, more with a yawn than a standing ovation. In true Irish fashion, everybody's talking about it, but if the data is saying anything, it may be that the love affair between the people and the church is on very rocky ground; one side is not hearing the other and the gulf is growing wider every day.