Friday, February 20, 2009
It was great to see Steve Shiffrin (and many other MOJers) at Villanova. I appreciate Steve's report from the Scarpa conference, and will soon be posting some reactions of my own. For now, just a quick question: Steve says that it is "clearly right" to say that a law "founded on a religious purpose" is unconstitutional. How, though, do we distinguish between "religious" purposes, and "purposes that many people who are religious hold"?