September 24, 2013
The Little Sisters of the Poor: Ordinarily in Their Homes for the Elderly Poor, but Today in Federal Court
Each Catholic religious order has its own special charism that can be seen in institutions founded by and run by members of the order. In and through their various institutions, I have personally experienced the distinctive charism of Dominican sisters, Salesian priests, brothers, and sisters, Capuchin Franciscan priests, Holy Cross priests and brothers, Jesuit seminarians and priests, and Augustinian priests and brothers, among others. It was not until earlier this year, however, that I encountered the distinctive charism of the Little Sisters of the Poor in their own distinctive institutions: homes for the elderly poor. The Little Sisters' charism is one of hospitality, in which the Sisters strive to "be little in order to be close to the most humble, and [to] be close to make them happy."
Like many Catholics, I was familiar with the Little Sisters from their trips to our parish to beg for funds for their ministry. I knew that they knew how to ask in a way that touched the hearts of the congregation. But it was not until I met some of the sisters at St. Joseph's Home in Richmond (including two Sisters from St. Martin's Home in Baltimore), and again at Jeanne Jugan Residence in Washington, D.C., that I understood on a deeper personal level the real difference that their presence makes in the lives of their homes' residents and in the life of the Church. It’s the difference that comes from knowing that one is loved and has dignity and will not die alone, and the difference that comes from vowed women religious spreading that love, cultivating that dignity, and accompanying the dying on their final journey.
Unfortunately, however, the occasions for my visits to their homes were meetings to discuss legal matters. Like many religious organizations, the Little Sisters have needed to figure out how to deal with the federal government’s refusal to treat them as a religious employer exempt from the legal requirement to offer health benefit plans that violate their religious beliefs. The fruit of some of those earlier consultations was a set of comments in response to the federal government’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. In those comments, the Little Sisters respectfully requested the government “to reach a just resolution that respects the religious freedom and conscience rights of all.” And the comments expressed the hope “that it is unnecessary for us to join the scores of employers that have already resorted to the federal courts for protection.”
That hope has now met necessity, and the Sisters are now in federal court. Through two of their homes (in Denver and in Baltimore), the Little Sisters have filed a lawsuit, together with Christian Brothers Services and Christian Brothers Employee Benefits Trust (which cooperate with religious organizations in the provision of benefits). The lawsuit seeks relief from enforcement of the requirement to arrange their health benefit plans so that beneficiaries receive no-cost access to female sterilization and all FDA-approved contraceptive drugs and devices (including some with abortifacient properties).
Although aware of the Little Sisters’ religion-based objections to this requirement, the federal government has refused to treat the Little Sisters’ homes as “religious employers” that receive an exemption. Having witnessed the Sisters’ ministry in these homes and having worshipped with the Little Sisters in the St. Joseph's Home's chapel, this refusal boggles even the lawyerly part of my mind. These Little Sisters of the Poor homes are—in the words of Cardinal George—“icons of mercy where Christ is welcomed and served in the elderly poor with the utmost respect for their dignity.” In any ordinary time, these homes would easily be recognized as "religious employers." But perhaps this is no ordinary time. If the federal government continues to refuse to recognize these homes as “religious employers” under the federal contraceptives mandate, then words have lost their meaning for them.
The lead lawyers on the case are from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and Locke Lord LLP. I am continuing to assist the Little Sisters as part of their legal team and will therefore be more circumspect than I might otherwise be in discussing various aspects of the case. But the complaint speaks for itself. And the Becket Fund has created a case page with more background, including a press release and a web video, which I encourage all to check out.
I am so proud of the legal team that is assisting these wonderful sisters. Thank God for all of them and they will be in my prayers.
Posted by: Bonnie Walsh | Sep 24, 2013 7:16:08 PM
Thanks, Mom, for reading MOJ. Watch out federal government! See, e.g., St. Monica (demonstrating the power of a mother's prayers).
Posted by: Kevin C. Walsh | Sep 24, 2013 7:54:02 PM
If I ever happen to do any blogging again, I think that I, too, will try to get my mom to post comments, though I also think that I'll try to get her to use a phoney name! (Just teasing, Kevin. If my mom actually did post a comment people might not be able to tell it apart from those spambot comments that say things like "wow, this is a great article! I learned so much from your article!" and then wonder why the comment isn't trying to lead them to a site selling storm windows or whatever is sold that way these days.)
Posted by: Matt | Sep 24, 2013 10:05:03 PM
I had to laugh out LOUD about this....you mean the Little Sisters, who ONLY minister to the old and poor people, are actually being told they MUST buy 'contraceptive and abortion' insurance? Someone back there in Washington running this program isn't paying attention......
Posted by: Reta Tallman | Sep 25, 2013 6:14:39 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.