« Windsor & Perry |
| G.K. Chesterton's Nightmare »
June 26, 2013
Lawlessness cuts more than one way
The Catholic bishops in the United States need better guidance and more prudence. The USCCB's statement earlier today regarding the Supreme Court decisions in Windsor
includes the following sentence: "It is also unfortunate that the Court did not take the opportunity to uphold California’s Proposition 8 but instead decided not to rule on the matter." Why? Chief Justice Roberts's opinion makes clear that the Court understood itself *not* to have had lawfully before it the "opportunity" to uphold Proposition 8. Reasonable minds can disagree about whether or not the Court should have found that there was standing in Perry
, and thus an "opportunity" to reach the merits, but Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan determined that standing was lacking. On what basis, then, does the USCCB rebuke the Court for refusing an "opportunity" that the USCCB assuredly cannot demonstrate that the Court possessed? "Conservative" complaints about so-called "judicial activism" ring hollow when judged against such "activist" grievances.
Posted by Patrick Brennan on June 26, 2013 at 06:39 PM in Brennan, Patrick | Permalink