« Theological Argument in the Law | Main | "The Holy Feast of the Intransitive Verb" »

November 21, 2012

Amicus Brief in Stormans v. Salecky

I am happy to have joined an amicus brief together with several other constitutional law professors (including fellow MOJ writers Rick, Robby, and Michael P.) -- but written by Doug Laycock and some excellent lawyers in Austin, Texas -- in Stormans v. Salecky, an interesting case currently being litigated in the Western District of Washington and the Ninth Circuit.  The case concerns the free exercise rights of several pharmacists at small pharmacies who have religious conscience objections to dispensing Plan B emergency contraception, and who are being compelled to do so by the Washington State Board of Pharmacy's regulations requiring all pharmacies to dispense certain drugs, without exception.  I am particularly keen on the description in the brief of Smith and Lukumi-Babalu as representing a kind of range of general applicability -- the idea being that many cases will fall somewhere between those two points.  That's nifty, because one often sees Lukumi instead described as an "exception" to the Smith "rule," which has different connotations and implications.  You can read more about the case in Judge Leighton's most recent opinion.

Posted by Marc DeGirolami on November 21, 2012 at 03:23 PM in DeGirolami, Marc | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515a9a69e2017d3e06c6a4970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Amicus Brief in Stormans v. Salecky:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.