Comments on Wack-a-Doddle-ry in ACLU v. SebeliusTypePad2012-03-27T13:29:00ZRick Garnetthttps://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2012/03/wack-a-doddle-ry-in-aclu-v-sebelius/comments/atom.xml/Fr. J commented on 'Wack-a-Doddle-ry in ACLU v. Sebelius'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e2016303574271970d2012-03-27T17:07:56Z2012-03-27T17:07:56ZFr. JThe issue was never what helped children or reduced human trafficking. They simply didn't care. They wanted to hurt the...<p>The issue was never what helped children or reduced human trafficking. They simply didn't care. They wanted to hurt the Church or force her to help kill children in the womb. The culture of death is insidious. </p>Marc DeGirolami commented on 'Wack-a-Doddle-ry in ACLU v. Sebelius'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d834515a9a69e201630355da15970d2012-03-27T14:03:15Z2012-03-27T14:03:15ZMarc DeGirolamiRick, I agree: http://clrforum.org/2012/03/27/awarding-government-contracts-to-catholic-organizations-violates-the-establishment-clause/ I also note that the Obama Administration could hardly have gotten a better ruling. It now...<p>Rick, I agree: <a href="http://clrforum.org/2012/03/27/awarding-government-contracts-to-catholic-organizations-violates-the-establishment-clause/" rel="nofollow">http://clrforum.org/2012/03/27/awarding-government-contracts-to-catholic-organizations-violates-the-establishment-clause/</a> </p>
<p>I also note that the Obama Administration could hardly have gotten a better ruling. It now seems that withdrawing the contract from the USCCB and awarding it to somebody else (anybody "non-religious") was the only constitutionally viable option.</p>