May 27, 2009
Sotomayor may not be so bad
Sotomayor is being attacked by pro-lifers for two reasons: She is said to be pro-abortion, and she is said to be a judicial activist.
But on each of the three past occasions when abortion was connected to the case before her on the bench, she ruled against abortion.
Am i missing something, or don't these three outcomes tend to show that although she might be pro-abortion or she might be a judicial activist, she can't be both? (Because if she were both, she would probably have come out on the other side of those cases.)
Posted by rstith on May 27, 2009 at 02:31 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sotomayor may not be so bad: